> I've just rebuilt one of my projects against 1.9 and rerun the test
> suite. Here are some of the semantic changes that I've found. Would it
> be possible for someone to tell me which of these I should file as bugs
> and which are desired changes?
>
> o No ProcessorError is raised when a transformation is done on an XML
> document without a stylesheet (a warning is generated; this behavior
> is arguably correct)
Can you be more specific about what you mean when you say "without a
stylesheet'? Do you mean the code path where the processor looks in the
source document for any stylesheet PIs?
> o XSLError is no longer raised when a call to write() on the output
> stream is called (seems like a bug; an exception would be best
> but at least an error or warning should be generated)
You said: "when a call to write() on the output stream is called". I'm
not sure I understand. Do you mean a call to write() is failing, and no
error is returned? That would definitely be a bug.
> o Calls to non-existant XPath functions do longer generate an exception
> (seems like bug)
That's absolutely a bug!
> o Invalid XPath expressions based as top level arguments do not generate
> exceptions e.g. "foo()" or "((((" (seems like a bug)
Bug for sure.
> o Possible memory leak with InputSource objects returned by
> EntityResolvers (need to investige more; i've called wolf on this
> before)
That's probably a Xerces-C issue, if you can reproduce it.
Feel free to file any or all of these as bugs. Thanks!
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
