[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2114?page=comments#action_12312993 ]
Brian Minchau commented on XALANJ-2114: --------------------------------------- The difference between && versus & is that && is short circuited and only evaluates the second operand if necessary. There are no side effects here, and it would have to perform at least as good with && and with ||. John G. will provide the simple patch. Brian M. will review - from the JIRA meeting June 7, 2005. > odd non-shortcircuited boolean logic > ------------------------------------ > > Key: XALANJ-2114 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2114 > Project: XalanJ2 > Type: Bug > Versions: CurrentCVS > Environment: win32 xp > Reporter: Dave Brosius > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.7.0-future-release > > In class: org.apache.xpath.objects.XString > In method: public double toDouble() > Using non short-circuited logic operators.... Is this on purpose? > if (c != '-' & c != '.' & ( c < 0X30 | c > 0x39)) { > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Also in class: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMDefaultBase > In method: public boolean isNodeAfter(int nodeHandle1, int nodeHandle2) > return index1!=NULL & index2!=NULL & index1 <= index2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
