Hi, Brian.
Brian Minchau/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2005-10-27 12:15:13 PM:
> The Xalan committers have voted to move from CVS to Subversion as the
code
> repository.
>
> This will most likely happen early to mid next week (Nov. 1 or 2). There
> is a Subversion test repository that should look like the code when
> migrated (thanks to Henri Yandell). Please have a look (especially Xalan
> committers) and post to [email protected] if you have concerns,
or
> even if it looks OK.
I checked out copies of xml-xalan/java/trunk and
xml-xalan/test/trunk, compared them with the source in CVS, ran smoketest
and smoketest.xsltc. Everything looked good. I didn't experiment with
any branches, though.
I want to alert everyone to the problem with using date revisions in
Subversion for code that's migrated from CVS.[1] If you're used to using
dates in CVS to track down when and why a problem was injected into the
source, you'll find that a little more difficult with Subversion - at
least for the migrated revisions. Once we switch over to Subversion
completely, all new revisions will be recorded in chronological order and
won't exhibit the same problem.
Thanks,
Henry
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#svnproblems
------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Zongaro Xalan development
IBM SWS Toronto Lab T/L 969-6044; Phone +1 905 413-6044
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
