[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2270?page=comments#action_12369310 
] 

Denis Haskin commented on XALANJ-2270:
--------------------------------------

Yes (that I don't know *why* I would want them in the separate jars).  And 
maybe the answer is that if I have to ask, it shouldn't matter to me?  <grin>

> http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/downloads.html should indicate why one would 
> choose one binary distribution over the other
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: XALANJ-2270
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2270
>      Project: XalanJ2
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Documentation
>     Reporter: Denis Haskin
>     Priority: Minor

>
> The pge http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/downloads.html says
> "There are 2 binary distributions available; you only need to choose one of 
> them." and then gives the details of how they are different.
> But there's no indication (that I could tell) why I should choose one over 
> the other, what the issues are, why there are two forms of packaging, etc.  A 
> hint would be nice.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to