Mark Weaver wrote:
Any interest in this? I've also finished off:
regexp: http://www.blushingpenguin.com/mark/xalanc/exslt-regexp.patch
(requires boost)
date: http://www.blushingpenguin.com/mark/xalanc/exslt-dates.patch
(everything except the date-format extension element).
Would be nice to get some feedback, even if it's just to be a bit more
patient ;)
Thanks,
Mark
Hey Mark,
Sorry, I've been incredibly busy with work these days, so I haven't had
lots of time to look at possible patches.
Is there any chance you could adapt the exslt-regexp patch to work with
Xerces-C's regular expression implementation? That would be far better
than requiring boost, since Xerces-C is guaranteed to be there. Another
choice would be to support both, with a fallback to Xerces-C if boost is
not available, or not desired.
>
This seemed to have got lost (at least, I haven't seen it appear on
the list in about 24 hours -- I apologise if this is duplicated).
In the meantime, I've also implemented the rest of exsl:dyn &
exsl:random.
Dyn:
http://www.blushingpenguin.com/mark/xalanc/exslt-dyn.patch
Random:
http://www.blushingpenguin.com/mark/xalanc/exslt-random.patch
random:random-sequence doesn't seem very well defined (returns
number+, which presumably means nodeset). I attempted to follow the
only other implementation I could find -- that of the EXSL.NET
implementation.
dyn and random are trickier, and random is still under-specified (there
was some discussion on the EXSLT list about this at least 3 years ago).
I'd like to make sure the implementation is clean, but is also
flexible. Hopefully, I can find some time in the next 3 weeks to look
at the patches.
Thanks!
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
