[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470654
]
Brian Minchau commented on XALANJ-2355:
---------------------------------------
During the Xalan-J JIRA triage on February 5, 2007 Dave Marston said that what
he
is thinking of is that there are some cases where there is a prefix collision
and
the processor must generate a prefix, e.g. ns0, ns1, ns2 ...
The output XML need only have the output elements in the correct namespace
(URI) but the prefix for the element is a sort of necessary evil. Where
possible a processor usually uses the same prefixes as in the stylesheet or in
the input XML, but it need not, just as long as the output elements are in the
correct namespace.
The gold file may have some prefixes, or indeed even all prefixes, that were
not in the stylesheet or in the xml being transformed.
The issue seems to be how smart the comparator program is in the test harness.
So perhaps all of the tests that Dave was thinking of are still valid
conformance tests. Dave said he will revisit this JIRA issue.
> Some namespace tests should be moved from 'conformance' to 'acceptance'
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: XALANJ-2355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2355
> Project: XalanJ2
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Brian Minchau
> Fix For: The Latest Development Code
>
>
> During the Xalan-J JIRA triage on December 11, 2006 David Marston suggested
> that there might
> be tests in the namespace area that are actually 'acceptance' tests that
> should be moved out
> of the 'conformance' area.
> One such test would be due to XALANJ-2334 and XALANJ-2150.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
