Joseph Kesselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/26/2002 09:45:39 AM:
> I'd lean slightly toward xml-commons,
> simply because it should be made reusable with any implementation of
> either DOM or XPath.
Without wanting to start a thread on xml-commons, I don't think it should
go there. xml-commons should be a repository for very stable APIs and very
highly used implementation classes like perhaps a QName class. We should
always be very careful about what goes into xml-commons... otherwise you're
risking spaghetti.
-scott
