On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 2:20 AM, ajay bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why xalan 2.7.1 takes more cpu than standard java 1.5. inbuild with > xalan-2.6.0 version ?
I don't generally consider CPU utilization as a measure of performance (it's an important aspect, though). It's normally beyond programmer's control. I usually try to optimize memory usage, and run time. It would be nice, if you can share the run time comparison. > What should I do so that I can get the same performace with xalan-2.7.1 as I > am getting with Standard java 1.5 ? First please share the performance numbers of Xalan-J 2.7.1 vs. JDK Xalan. The performance data could vary from one XML/XSL to another. Also, is using Xalan-J 2.7.1 important to you, or the performance? Is performance affecting you very badly? Xalan-J 2.7.1 has lot of improvements (bug fixes, etc.) as compared to the Xalan bundled with JDK. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
