--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Thomas Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, my question is not so much when or whether this will be
> available, but rather, Why WON"T it be available?
For that to happen, you would need someone actively working on it.
My understanding that this would be a major undertaking.
So you'd need to find someone who has time & interest to take such an
undertaking. Perhaps someone with an itch to scratch...
> We have a fairly strong business need to support XSLT 2.0
> in the near future, and it looks like the only other
> portable processor is Saxon, with its potential IP
> concerns.
Does fairly strong business mean that you would actually be able to support
such an effort (financially, by having someone work on it or so)?
I would also be interested in hearing what "IP" concerns you are thinking.
I wasn't aware of significant differences between Xalan and Saxon in this
regard. In fact, given that you can get a commercial license for Saxon, most
companies would think Saxon might be a safer option in this regard.
-+ Tatu +-
