On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:52:05 -0700
Kimbro Staken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As I've been working on the implementation of the API I've come across a
> few things that should probably change. I wanted to outline them here
> for discussion before making the changes.
> 
> The Collection interface should have setResourceType and getResouceType
> methods. These had been piggybacked on set/getProperty but this is
> important enough functionality that it should probably be a regular
> method.

Why the Collection interface needs setter/getter for ResourceType? Does
a Collection can not contain different Resources, e.g. DOM and Binary?
Did I overlooked something here?

> The Resource interface should have a getResourceType method so that you
> can know what kind of resource it encapsulates.

sounds reasonable

> In Collection there should probably be a getChildCollection method to
> retrieve a collection relative to the current collection.
> 
> In Collection there is currently a getChildCollections method that
> returns a list of Collection instances. This would probably be better as
> a listChildCollections method that returns a list of child collection
> names instead of actual collection instances. You could then use
> getChildCollection to retrieve the Collection instances as needed.
> 
> In Collection there should probably be a way to test for the existance
> of a Resource prior to retrieving/changing/deleting it.
> 
> In Collection there should probably be a way to test for the existence
> of a particular service.

Well I see the advantages of dedicated "exists" methods but I'm not sure
whether they're really necessary?!

1. proceeding you request:

        if (collection.serviceExists("XPathQueryService", "1.0")) {
           Service service = collection.getService("XPathQueryService",
                             "1.0");
           service.setCollection(collection);
           ....
        }

or 2. current proceeding:

        Service service = null;
        if ((service = collection.getService("XPathQueryService", "1.0"))
                             != null) {
            service.setCollection(collection);
            ....
        }

Same for Resources....


> I think that's it for now.
> 
> -- 
> Kimbro Staken
> Chief Technology Officer
> dbXML Group L.L.C
> http://www.dbxmlgroup.com
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Post a message:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe:            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Contact adminstrator:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------


--
______________________________________________________________________
Lars Martin                                    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a message:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact adminstrator:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to