Hi there

I just noticed the nice SetContentHandler class in the SDK. When I took
one more look around the SDK I noticed the Simple* classes which in my
oppinion don't make much sense. I don't use/need them in my
JDBC-implementation. Anyway. I'd like to propose a merge of xmldb.jar
and xmldb-sdk.jar. That won't hurt the xmldb.jar much and if the drivers
need classes from the SDK, the target application need to include 3 jars
only for XML:DB. Windows still suffers from classpath-length problems!

To compensate for my comment above I have attached two helper classes
that might be a useful addition to the Java-XML:DB-API. They can be used
in the context of JAXP 1.1 transformations and XML:DB. Please look at
the javadoc usage example in XMLResourceInputSource.

Jeremias M�rki

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OUTLINE AG
Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
Fon +41 (41) 317 2020 - Fax +41 (41) 317 2029
Internet http://www.outline.ch

Attachment: XMLResourceInputSource.java
Description: Binary data

Attachment: XMLResourceReader.java
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to