Anyone familiar with the linux filesystem standards and directory heirarchy standards?
A question has been brought up w.r.t. the Xastir manpage and where it should reside. Looking at FHS-2.3 it appears that "/usr/local/man" is the proper place, as we're doing now. If an install prefix is specified to configure though, such as "/usr", then we should be installing to "/usr/share/man" instead of "/usr/man"? I also see that "/usr/local/share/man" and "/usr/local/man" are supposed to be one and the same, meaning one should be a symlink to the other. On my SuSE system that isn't the case. What is _THE_ standard we should be going by? The FHS? FSSTD? FSSTND? For LSB compliance we may need to change things around a bit from default, but we have spec files and a configure-time parameter to use to trigger off of in that case. What I'm interested in are the standard places we should install to, both for the default and for when an install prefix is specified. Looking here: <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html> it appears that the FSSTND/FSSTD was renamed to the FHS when they widened the scope of it from Linux to general Unix systems. Down near the end of the document in the section: "Background of the FHS". -- Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!" _______________________________________________ Xastir-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir-dev
