On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Tom Russo wrote: > The --without-shapelib deal was meant to be a temporary way of allowing us > to enable/disable internal shapefile support, not as a long-term deal. It > was also very easy to co-opt that existing option to slam in the feature.
Beats my method of changing permissions on the installed header file! > We should definitely change it before doing a stable release. > > > *) Should we add text the configure final output and perhaps the > > Help->About text to show that we're using the internal library? > > > > Something like: > > > > Building with ShapeLib ..................... : yes (internal) > > Yes, that would be nice. Just making sure we're on the same page. I'll see about doing some or all of these changes. Thanks. -- Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!" _______________________________________________ Xastir-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir-dev
