On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Curt, WE7U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It doesn't have to be a heavy database.

Right, but if the decision is made to support a single database (quite
reasonable), will it be heavy or light?

If the decision is made to use GIS extensions, I would think we would
want to either use GIS extensions or not, and not code both ways just
to keep support for light databases?


I realize I'm not a developer, so feel free to tell me to shut up at
any time. (:

-Jason
kg4wsv
_______________________________________________
Xastir-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir-dev

Reply via email to