On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Liz wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:28:21 -0700
Tom Hayward <[email protected]> wrote:
ARRL signs certificates, free (free wold-wide, regardless of
membership), that can be trusted more than a CAPTCHA.
I thought I would test this possibility.
Installing software (5 min)
Trying to negotiate the interface (5 min)
Supporting documentation needs to be posted to USA (2 weeks)
Opportunity for non-hams to obtain certificate - couldn't find any
information - I was thinking of SWLs here
My conclusion is that TQSL isn't suitable for the wiki.
We shouldn't prevent non-hams from signing up and contributing.
As I understand it it's an either-or. If people have the certificate then
they're authenticated w/o having to go through the captcha or even the login
procedure. If they're not, then the login/password and Captcha's will suffice.
If it was _only_ the certificate and nothing else, I would not want it
implemented.
--
Curt, WE7U. http://wetnet.net/~we7u
APRS Client Capabilities: http://wetnet.net/~we7u/aprs_capabilities.html
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
[email protected]
http://xastir.org/mailman/listinfo/xastir
