On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Tom Russo wrote: > > Or possibly the CVS update slipped in a 0x000000 as that is what this > > was compiled against this morning (-r RELEASE). > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > [affecting best mechanic's demeanor] Welllllllll, *therrrrre's* yer problem. > > Adding "-r RELEASE" to a cvs checkout or update is NOT the same as getting the > latest CVS code, no matter how often you do a cvs update. It selects the > version that was last tagged for release, or in other words, the last > official > release version.
By the way, there's also the "STABLE" tag which I try to update when I think CVS is nice and stable. It's not _guaranteed_ to be a stable version, but it's the best guess at it I can make based on what's been changed and how many bug reports we've been getting in the recent past. -- Curt, WE7U. archer at eskimo dot com http://www.eskimo.com/~archer Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U. The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!" _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
