Personal perspective: Wiki is a DOCUMENTATION tool. It's not really an intra-group communications tool. Every wiki I've used for the latter has shown this to be the case.

I'd recommend using the Wiki for creating a best of breed documentation project and to incorporate a dynamic FAQ page.

Just mu $.02

gerry

Jason Winningham wrote:

On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Curt, WE7U wrote:

In fact, I'm already wondering if we won't over time be creating TWO
master sets of documentation between our current Wiki and our
distributed text files.

would it be possible to create one from the other? Maybe use the wiki as the master, and use some sort of text extraction tool to create text files for the source distribution (or distribute html and text, or just html)?

Or create wiki/html pages from the source READMEs, and let users contribute to other areas on the wiki.

-Jason
kg4wsv



_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir

--
Gerry Creager -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University        
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020  FAX 979.862.3983
MAIL:  AATLT, 3139 TAMU
Physical: 1700 Research Parkway, Suite 160,
College Station, TX 77843-3139
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir

Reply via email to