Well, I think I found the issue:
In wx.c, at line 427, in cycle_weather, wx_speed, not wx_gust was
getting passed to compute_gust.
Here's the diff:
427c427
< computed_gust = compute_gust((float)atof(weather-
>wx_gust),
---
computed_gust = compute_gust((float)atof(weather-
>wx_speed),
if you look at my data going to findu, it's now reporting much more
reasonable gust (32MPH so far this evening, the power's out and the
storm "center" is still several hours away).
Clay
N7QNM
On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:43 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Clay Jackson wrote:
But, when I looked at "Own weather data" in Xastir, I was still
seeing really low gust figures.
So, I looked at the Xastir code - there appears to be some
"averaging" going on there as well (I haven't yet read it well enough
to understand exactly what it's doing)
If I remember correctly it's a five-minute average, per the spec
we're supposed to work towards. Perhaps that's changed.
Can someone shed some light on what Xastir's doing, and more
importantly, WHY it might be doing that?
Naw. Go away. (Can anyone tell I actually _know_ Clay?) ;-)
--
Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir