On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 11:02:18AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:51:49AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron > collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:43:47PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron > > collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > > > > > > > > > To whom it may concern...... > > > > > > CVS download this morning results in this: see below the tail end of the > > > compile process... > > > Maybe I need to change something, or should I just wait?? > > > This just showed up today... > > [...] > > Apparently your Motif library is using it and so xastir has an indirect > > dependence on the Xp library that other systems do not have. It's been that > > way for a few days and most folks have checked in to say that there has been > > no problem. > > > > Please try looking at configure.ac at around line 113 for the following: > > # TVR: commented this out. It appears that XpGetDocumentData is not used > > # *anywhere* in Xastir, and the fact that this is being probed for has > > # confused at least one user into thinking he needed to install the X > > Printing > > # Extension library when it was completely unnecessary. > > # AC_CHECK_LIB([Xp], [XpGetDocumentData]) > > > > Remove the "# " from the last line of that and re-run bootstrap. That > > should > > cause the Xp library to be linked in again when you re-configure and make. > > > > Please let us know what system you're on and what motif library you're > > using. > > It's possible I need to re-enable that test, but it would be nice to do so > > only on systems that have Motif libraries with this dependence (otherwise > > we're linking in stuff that isn't necessary).
I have re-enabled the check for Xp in the configure script and committed the change, since it is necessary on at least one type of system. You can cvs update and should be back up and running. It would be nice if we didn't have to do this explicit link for all systems, but I can't think of any quick way to probe for whether it's necessary or not through autoconf --- I'm sure there's a way, but re-enabling the global test is quick and painless. I had disabled it in the first place because it had misled a user into downloading a package he didn't need (development headers in libxp-dev), but libxp certainly is needed by motif. Most systems seem satisfy this dependency without us explicitly linking -lXp, but there you have it. -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 AHTB#1 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM "And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit!" --- The Tick _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list Xastir@xastir.org http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
