Eric,
The code, from what I see, can be prioritized. Last night, I had two up
at once over Chicago - Svr Tstorm and Tornado. If they can be
consistently layered, the need for priority goes out the window. The
layering would allow for showing all warnings that are active for the area.
73 from 807,
Richard, N6NKO
Eric H Christensen wrote:
Shouldn't there be a way to prioritize them? For example, the Thunderstorm
Warning should be trumped by the Tornado Warning. I think UIV had a
prioritization scheme that showed the color for the highest alert and then on
mouse over would show all of the alerts for that particular county.
73s,
Eric W4OTN
Just completed the .xbm for DENSE_FOG.
Now this message and HEAT (ADVIS and WARN) both appear to use the zone
areas...
# 1186362239 Sun Aug 05 20:03:59 CDT 2007
ILNNPW>APRS::NWS_WARN
:061000z,HEAT,INZ50-58-59-66-73>75-80-KYZ89>98-OHZ60>62-70>72-78-79 {600BB
# 1186362275 Sun Aug 05 20:04:35 CDT 2007
AFCNPW>APRS::NWS_ADVIS:061145z,DENSE_FOG,AKZ131 {5NdAB
I wonder if this is why HEAT did not show up?
Heading to bed so,
73 from 807,
Richard, N6NKO
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
