> Yeah, but here is the interesting part. ImageMagick was already installed on > my computer. Not sure why it isn't working but the package maintainer is on > the job. He filed a NEEDINFO and I just sent it to him.
>> Well, there's your problem! (right?) 'XPM and/or ImageMagick support have >> not been compiled in." Isn't Image/GraphicsMagick required to display online >> maps? Also suggest they use GraphicsMagick over ImageMagick due to the >> historical problems with a dynamic API. Admittedly I don't know enough to tell if this is relevant, but when I tried to compile (on Fedora 9 - arghhh) from CVS sources without ImageMagick, I kept getting an error about GraphicsMagick even though the GraphicsMagick library was in /usr/lib and /etc/ld.so.conf contained that path: checking for GraphicsMagick-config... /usr/bin/GraphicsMagick-config checking GraphicsMagick/magick/api.h usability... yes checking GraphicsMagick/magick/api.h presence... yes checking for GraphicsMagick/magick/api.h... yes checking for WriteImage in -lGraphicsMagick... no configure: WARNING: *** Cannot find GraphicsMagick library files: Building w/o GraphicsMagick support. *** checking for Magick-config... no When I yum installed ImageMagick-devel the above GraphicsMagick error went away, but I still have no online maps... Just an FYI. 73 -- John _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list Xastir@xastir.org http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
