I'm a CTR fan - every project I've ever used and have ever worked on works like that (apart from Geronimo) and its very effective, works well, allows projects to be productive and usually changes are pretty small so by reading the commit log/mails you can keep up to date. The beauty of using a SCM is you can always roll stuff back if you need to, if folks have an issue with a particular direction or change :).
So in summary I'm agreeing with Guillaume - lets use CTR unless folks think there is a particular area which requires RTC for big changes or contentious issues etc. On 8/23/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geronimo is considering a change to its review and commit policies. As a subproject, I think we should discuss how we would like to handle reviewing code and when it should be committed. So... How do you think we should handle this process? What rules-of-thumb should we use to guide ourselves? -dain
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
