Both are ok, the tar is for "normal" users, the CVS is good for people that want to be up to date which means the latest fixes, changes, addons and bugs ;-) and of course for developers or people that want to help finding bugs in which case I make some changes and they can update their sources from the CVS and see whether their problem is solved.
But however, everyone may try which one they like to and people that don't (in this case) use spam bouncer needn't to worry - both are OK for them. But people that use spam bouncer may prepare to use something else or by hand and this should use the CVS because it's in the tree and so I have to maintain it to make it compile with the rest. J�rgen Urivan Saaib wrote: > Hi J�rgen, > > So you recommend to build XC-Mail using tar file instead CVS ? > > Regards, > > ---Reply to mail from J�rgen Schmitz about XCmail: tar.gz file incomplete. > >>That'S ok, spam bouncer has been removed because it doesn't work any >>more with the current release of it - and theres no time to update it. >> >>However, I'm now working with spam assassin which is more flexibel but >>less complicated to configure. >> >>J�rgen >> >>Urivan Saaib wrote: >> >> >>>Hi All, >>> >>>Just downloaded the 2.2 tar.gz file of XCmail and found that is incomplete, by >>>now the plugins/spam_bouncer folder is not included, but is in the CVS. >>> >>>I recall read something about it, but thats some days ago. >>> >>>Regards, >>>_______________________________________________________ >>>Urivan Saaib >>>Presidente >>>CiberNET Mexico >>>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Tel/Fax: +52 (646) 1757195 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > ---End reply > > > _______________________________________________________ > Urivan Saaib > Presidente > CiberNET Mexico > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tel/Fax: +52 (646) 1757195 > > > >
