On Nov 21, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Seth Willits <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Quincey Morris > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I presume the default “Skip Install” for a framework is YES because that’s >> what you want when you’re making a private embedded framework, which is >> perhaps the usual case these days. >> >> So, factoring out Xcodes’s terminological, functional and configurational >> weirdnesses, it seems to be working for me. > > The other thing "install" affects is if you bundle that framework with an > app. By having "install" turned on, that framework will now be a built > product that's included in the application's archive, which then makes Xcode > not recognize the archive as simply being an "application archive", so it > gets kind of messy. Should have seen Skip Install. It’s one of those things you know perfectly well, and never think of when you need it. Or I’m pushing 60. Thanks to all. — F _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
