On 9/22/15 15:43, [email protected] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:04:03 -0700
> From: Jens Alfke <[email protected]>
> To: Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> 
>> > On Sep 22, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Did anyone else see this? Could it be that I did anything wrong? Or is 
>> > this a bug in either Xcode’s building process or in LS, or the way they 
>> > work together (which I would call a bug in both)?
> I haven’t had this problem, but it would be a bug in Xcode; the variable is 
> supposed to be expanded to the actual bundle ID when the Info.plist is 
> generated at build time.

This is hard to do consistently, even inside Apple. Xcode 6.4 still has
executables with the signing identifiers “com.apple.${PRODUCT_NAME}” and
“com.apple”, as well as others with bundle identifier “${PRODUCT_NAME}”.

They fixed that in Xcode 7...

-- 
Rainer Brockerhoff  <[email protected]>
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
"In the affairs of others even fools are wise
In their own business even sages err."
http://brockerhoff.net/blog/

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to