Ation against Buckingham's creatures created a fierce temper of
suspicion about corruption all through the public service. Two
Committees were early appointed by the House of Commons: one a Committee
on Grievances, such as the monopolies; the other, a Committee to inquire
into abuses in the Courts of Justice and receive petitions about them.
In the course of the proceedings, the question arose in the House as to
the authorities or "referees" who had certified to the legality of the
Crown patents or grants which had been so grossly abused; and among
these "referees" were the Lord Chancellor and other high officers, both
legal and political. It was the little cloud. But lookers-on like
Chamberlain did not think much of it. "The referees," he wrote on Feb.
29th, "who certified the legality of the patents are glanced at, but
they are chiefly above the reach of the House; they attempt so much that
they will accomplish little." Coke, who was now the chief leader in
Parliament, began to talk ominously of precedents, and to lay down rules
about the power of the House to punish--rules which were afterwards
found to have no authority for them. Cranfield, the representative of
severe economy, insisted that the honour of the King required that the
referees, whoever they were, should be called to account. The gathering
clouds shifted a little, when the sense of the House seemed to incline
to giving up all retrospective action, and to a limitation for the f

<<inline: brings.jpg>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience,
a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. 
Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Xconfig-common mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xconfig-common

Reply via email to