Awesome, thanks!
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its on the Wiki here: > http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/xcpu/index.php?title=Xcpu-build . > > I will try to clean up the website a little. > > On Mar 6, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Greg Kurtzer wrote: > >> >> Do you happen to have the URL to the XCPU subversion repository? I >> don't seem to see it on the site (but many of the links are broken). >> >> Thanks! >> Greg >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Daniel Gruner <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I am running version 755 of sxcpu. >>> >>> My system works quite well, except for the bjs batch queuing system, >>> which is killing jobs, apparently randomly. I have reported a bunch >>> of bugs for bjs. >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On sourceforge we are now at revision 757. >>>> >>>> We would like to have a stable release cycle, but we haven't really had >>>> that much time to work on XCPU recently. I plan to create a tarball and >>>> RPMs out of the current revision and put it on sourceforge today. >>>> >>>> We still have funding for it, but we have other projects as well that >>>> are currently taking higher priority. >>>> >>>> I don't know what versions people are using. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 08:38 -0800, Greg Kurtzer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello guys! >>>>> >>>>> Right now Caos and Perceus are at XCPU SVN release 733 and once this >>>>> gets commited is it recommended to update to 734? >>>>> >>>>> Is there still a push to get a stable and development release cycle >>>>> for XCPU? Having a 1.0 that gets bug fixes only would be very good for >>>>> people that are trying to count on this for production systems. >>>>> >>>>> What is the status of development of XCPU? Is there funding or other >>>>> sources for development efforts that are being planned? >>>>> >>>>> Also, what versions are other people using as stable (e.g. RR, and/or >>>>> other production systems)? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Greg >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Attached is a patch from Abhishek that he sent me a while back, but I >>>>>> never got a chance to look at. It removes the old checksum algorithm >>>>>> and uses a rolling adler32 checksum from libz. This greatly improves >>>>>> XGet's performance. >>>>>> >>>>>> He also fixed a bug related to the error handling in respondreqs. >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> Hugh Greenberg >>>>>> Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1 >>>>>> Email: [email protected] >>>>>> Phone: (505) 665-6471 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Greg Kurtzer >> http://www.infiscale.com/ >> http://www.perceus.org/ >> http://www.caoslinux.org/ > > -- > Hugh Greenberg > Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1 > [email protected] > > > > > -- Greg Kurtzer http://www.infiscale.com/ http://www.perceus.org/ http://www.caoslinux.org/
