I think this discussion has got a bit technical for the xcsoar-user group! Resolving the water issue is a high priority for 6.1 which is due halfway through March.
Max is currently on holiday. On 29 December 2010 13:27, Olaf Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Tobias Bieniek <[email protected]>: >> Good idea in general, but the JPEG2000 image is grayscale without any >> transparency and if I'm not entirely mistaken transparency isn't >> supported by JPEG2000. (at least I haven't seen it anywhere yet...) > > JPEG2000 definitely supports transparency. Even if support for > grayscale images with alpha channel is not supported by our JPEG2000 > processing tools it is equivialent to have a second 1bit jpeg2000 > image with the same size for the alpha channel. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers > to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, > should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database > without downtime or disruption > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Xcsoar-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
