I guess with a slow GPS sampling rate the error could be fairly large but when looking at the GPS speed it seems reasonably accurate. Anyway I am confident your decision was well though and founded.
I hope if some changes are made we still can use the final glide as it works now, it is simple intuitive and efficient. Cheers Jacques -----Original Message----- From: John Wharington [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 23 November 2011 12:25 AM To: Jacques Graells Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Xcsoar-user] About MC and tasks For historical note: In an earlier version of XCSoar we were using estimated airspeed (from GPS velocity + wind velocity) but since this is potentially unreliable in a non-conservative way, we removed that feature and only add kinetic energy if it is available via an ASI. On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Jacques Graells <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > Sorry I was not sufficiently accurate, in my experience if not > connected to a vario or ASI XCS does not account for kinetic energy. > I do not know if it does if connected to a vario/asi. > > Jacques > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
