Max, I already opened a ticket 2 days ago and myself and others demonstrated here many times how to reproduce it. In fact you just downgraded the ticket to a wishlist, basicly ignoring our annoying requests. Although i highly appreciate the work you done with XCSoar and swiched to it recently thanks to your port to Android, I find your attitude towards this issue dissappointing. And no, it is not only my problem as you can see from the many responds to this discussion. I know the workaround now, but this will be a problem to most XCSoar users. You will not hear from me anymore on this subject.
Signing off, Ramy On Nov 23, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Max Kellermann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011/11/23 17:23, Ramy Yanetz <[email protected]> wrote: >> unless you consider 5000 feet fluctuation on arrival altitude in >> couple of minutes a stable value. > > After 2 days of discussion, I still don't see your ticket describing > this very problem, demonstrating how to reproduce it. > >> Can we all conclude this discussion that XCSoar needs an urgent fix > > No, we can't. Your continued alarmism is annoying and doesn't add to > your credibility. Your problem isn't the most important one in the > world, and your feature request (that's what it is) does not need an > "urgent fix". > > Very recently, we had serious calculation problems that needed urgent > fixes, and after a few night shifts, we did publish new maintenance > releases after we figured them out. Your request is nowhere near > that. > > Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
