>Well, if a flarm-equiped glider 200m away cannot be detected, then I'd
assume someone's installation must be really really bad.....

Unfortunately, with a single antenna as all FLARMs except the new "Core"
unit have, there is no really good installation in any glider with a carbon
fuselage. The best compromise seems to be an antenna position on the panel,
but this means that there is almost no transmission in the aft-down
direction. Two such gliders in a thermal with some wind drift typically have
intermittent FLARM radio contact during circles.

>I dont think the issue is with close targets, and I dont think we are
talking about long periods of "filtering" in which the glider can
drastically change position. We are talking about few seconds, maybe 10
seconds the most, not sure

Let´s assume a speed of 40m/s (145km/h or 78kts) for a glider leaving a
thermal through the core and 25m/s (90km/h or 50kts) for the glider still
thermalling. Relative speed could be up to 65m/s, so in 10s this makes a
difference of 650m between filtered / predicted and real position in an
example based on typical and by no way extreme speeds.

Michael 

  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user

Reply via email to