On 11/27/06, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/11/26, Jean-Francois Dockes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - Should we provide one/several sample parsers to turn the query string
>   into a simple data structure ? This might help back-end adapter writers,
>   and also help remove any possible ambiguity from the language
definition.

There are several ways to do this. One idea could be to provide stand alone
libs for QT and GObject... Ie. no "bindings" just pure implementations.

A sample parser would help greatly, but the best way to remove ambiguities is
probably to provide a BNF grammar lest parser bugs become part of the
standard :-)

Fabrice
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg

Reply via email to