Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:08:46 +0100 Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:

Stanislav Brabec wrote:
- Image files in public directories are thumbnailed many times:
  once for each accessing user.
Sharing thumbnails might be a security problem.

- Thumbnails on removable media are thumbnailed many times: once for
  each machine, where medium is accessed
IIRC the standard already covers this, tho it's not implemented in Xfce
and GNOME.

- Thumbnail files are often larger than images itself, especially for
  jpeg images below 20kB in size.
The software can detect this and load the JPEG directly.

- There is a very small chance to detect deleted images and delete
  corresponding thumbnail.
The file manager should clean up the thumbnails when deleting files.

Use unique inode_number/volume_id instead of file_path.
This will not work with certain FUSE file systems, that generate unique
inodes on-demand, because it's likely that the inodes will be different
each time the file system is mounted.

Haw widely used desktop-neutral thumbnailing library understanding many
embedded thumbnails and providing thumbnailing for images without
embedded thumbnail.
I think external thumbnailer as used by Thunar/Nautilus are better,
because it's more flexible and avoids loading various libraries required
to generate thumbnails for different formats into the processes.

Using .desktop files to register thumbnailers instead of GConf should be
fine for desktop-neutral usage.

Allow jpeg thumbnails.
Aside from maybe a few bytes saved per thumbnail, why would you want to
do this?

it's nto a few bytes. for 128x128 sizes thumbs a thumbnail can go from a 20k
png to a 2k jpeg very very very easily. the jpeg thumbs invariably are
significantly smaller than the png ones (depending on the quality level you are
happy with). over the space of a few thousand thumbnails this make a BIG
difference.
I have 6731 thumbnails in ~/thumbnails/normal. This directory has a size of 110MB, so that's about 15KB a file. My home directory has 25GB of used space, with all pictures, latex files, postscript files, pdf files (which I have a lot of) being thumbnailed, so that seems quite small to me.

Thumbnails are quite a high-end feature anyway - even on a fast computer they take a little time to produce.
Thumbnails can use file system extended attributes.
Not every file system supports that. What would be stored in the
extended attributes anyway?

Benedikt
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
xdg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg



_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
xdg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg

Reply via email to