Le mercredi 30 avril 2008, à 17:18 +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles a écrit : > Quoting Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I totally agree that we need to put more than just versions of the > > specs, but also the adoption status, a kind of stability status (is it > > still in development, with potential incompatible changes in the > > future?), draft vs released status, etc. > > Regarding the adoption status, stability status, etc, I'd like to urge > both KDE eV and Gnome Foundation to "enforce" FreeDesktop.org's > specifications, as I discussed with Vincent and others at Guademy last > weekend. > > Long story short, it would be like this: if there is a fd.o spec for > what you are doing and you are not using it, your app/library won't > enter the official KDE/Gnome/whatever repository *unless* you provide > good reasons for not implementing the fd.o spec (that "unless" is > there in case the spec is disconnected from reality or plain junk).
Oh, I remember you mentioning this, but I forgot to ask you: any example of KDE or GNOME apps not following a spec without a good reason? (note that the issue is a bit orthogonal to the discussion, since the specs are, hopefully, more widely adopted than just in GNOME & KDE) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
