Mirco Müller wrote: > Am Samstag, den 13.06.2009, 23:18 +0200 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau: > >>> 3. The Ubuntu spec adds a 'sound-themed' hint, while we already have >>> 'sound-file'. I'd suggest just overloading 'sound-file' to take either >>> a sound theme name or a sound file. Implementations that only support a >>> full path will simply fail to play it; no big deal. With 'overloading', >>> implementations don't have to handle Yet Another Hint. Downside: apps >>> wishing to provide a sound theme name plus a fallback sound file path >>> won't be able to. Is that a big deal? (There's also the cosmetic >>> question as to what "sound-themed" logically means. It should be >>> something like "sound-name" or "themed-sound-name".) >> This is only present on the wiki page, notify-osd does not support sound >> at all at the moment. I believe this is just a mistake. > > notify-osd not yet supporting sound (via libcanberra) is a "mistake" on > my behalf.
The mistake I referred to was introducing a "sound-themed" hint on the wiki when there is already "sound-file". Aurélien _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
