On Thursday, August 22, 2013 02:43:19 PM Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > I think the xdg basedir spec has good ideals, and sure, it can take some > work to adopt it properly. But this subject comes up often enough to say > it should be dealt with properly. Having a spec that takes care of config, > data, cache but not state (at least not in a proper way) makes the spec > incomplete and what's the point of that? Keeping the spec 3/4-complete as > a "favor" to developers who are short on time/interest seems lame; I would > rather finish the spec and if devs don't feel like implementing it all the > way, they should at least accept patches from people who do.
Thank you! I've added a table that helps to see the difference between STATE and the other categories: https://wiki.debian.org/XDGBaseDirectorySpecification Thomas Koch _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg