On Monday 13 April 2015 23:08:26 Mattias Andrée wrote: > Consider the URL parsing code too, and > the fact that you need in object oriented > languages need to create an instance of an > URL class. Additionally, we cannot assume > that the generic syntax covers all display > server's syntax. In fact, x11 is not > covered. There is also the complexity of > URL encoding the pathnames. In shell scripts. > Furthermore at least DISPLAY must remain > for because of legacy programs.
I hadn't considered shell scripts. What's the use you're thinking for them
here? To use as a wrapper for the front-end application but launching different
backends or passing different options depending on the display server?
As for x11, it is covered just fine with x11::0.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
