Hi,
Within the GLib world the :: syntax is quite common for this kind of thing, it's a bit of a hack sure but arguably better than changing the interface
I see.
Of course if we do have a "Replied" instead of using ActionInvoked it would be better to use a hint than an action since actions are things you ActionInvoked
And how should that hint look like? Will it say "I want this action to do a quick reply if you can"?
Either way, a client has to check for it being supported before using it. Otherwise with my proposal they will just not connect to the signal and never get a reply, or in your case they will get an action invocation with an ID they don't expect: "inline-reply::Some Text" rather than the "inline-reply" they added.
Given this, I think a dedicated signal is more explicit. Cheers Kai Uwe _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
