Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]> writes: > The confusion is that the timestamps can't be generated "directly" but > must still wrap in the same way X server timestamps. In other words, > it's fine to source your timestamps directly from the monotonic clock, > if it's concluded that the X server uses it, but you must still make > sure you wrap the values as if the milli second part is encoded using a > unsigned 32 bit integer. Mutter got this wrong in the past, and it > results in wierd bugs with frozen GTK frame clocks after almost two > months of uptime.
Yes, that's what I said ought to be clarified. I'm sorry I wasn't too clear there. So aside from that, what else is preventing the protocol from being included in the wm-spec? And how can I help get it included? Thanks a lot in advance.
