> > <<
> > - Make @ejb:interface-method alone without type valid. It will look
at
> > bean's view-type and expand to local if bean's view-type="local" and
> > remote if "remote". For a bean with view-type="both" (or maybe we
should
> > change it to "local,remote"? I like comma-separated style, it's
> > consistent with other parts) expose the method to both local and
remote
> > homes. This is the preferred use case (not hard-coding remote/local
in
> > every method declaration when it's already specified for the whole
> > bean).
> > - If user declares something wrong (bean=local, method=remote) then
> > report an error.
> > - For local+remote, there won't be a need for a comma-seprated type
> > param like this: @ejb:interface-method type="local,remote" Or
multiple
> > @ejb:interface-method tags as an alternative. If bean's
> > view-type="remote,local" and you want the method only exposed to
local
> > interface then put a @ejb:interface-method type="local" there. If
you
> > want the method for both remote and local just don't put any type
param
> > there.
> > >>
> 
> seems to make perfect sense to me.  I could reiterate what you just
said -
> but I dont think its required (o:

Why not required?

> > Also I haven't got clear responses whether the following suggestion
is
> > approved/discarded/implemented (regarding generate="true|false":
> (regarding pk classes - yes?
> 
> > - If a types such as int, Integer, Object and so on -> obviously do
not
> > generate
> are we talking about pk classes?  I'm lost... sorry.

Yup.

> > PS: What should we do with weblogic support? It's outdated. Should
we
> > simply find/replace old @tags and make it use new @tags? I guess for
> > v1.0 we have to deliver it whatever it is. Also I locally have a
> > relatively complete orion support which I'll try to make a bit
better
> > and commit. Some bug-fixes, doc updates, wl/orion updates and we're
> > ready for v1.0.
> I dont use weblogic, so aren't really familiar with the tags... I'm
also
> not sure how much time I'm going to end up having for websphere this
w/e
> as it looks like I'll be at work )o:  One of the guys at work had
already
> done the ibm-ejb-jar-bnd.xmi and ibm-ejb-jar-ext.xmi, and is half way
> though Schema.dbxmi... asaik there is another file to do too...

Commit it man!

Ara.


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to