+1
(o:
I didn't know we had voting on this list... but anyway..
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] �berg wrote:
> Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> > It also fits with the fact that its pretty heavily tied to ant... cant
> > remember which project it was recently, but a similar argument (the we're
> > using apache, so our license should be apache-friendly) was put on that
> > list...
>
> Good point! So, essentially XDoclet is an Ant plugin. But that would
> make Ant GPL, which would violate Ant's license.
>
> So, there's not really much to discuss IMHO. Let's move to voting ASAP.
>
> /Rickard
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
