Yeah true. My aim was to make it backwards compatable. I have no
problems with deprecating jndi-name. Obviously if view-type is
"local" then we'll look for local-jndi-name, but if its not there, also
check for jndi-name before failing.
but yeah - happy to deprecated jndi-name.
cheesr
dim
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, if view-type is not "both", but "local" or "remote", then why not
> specify only "local-jndi-name" or "remote-jndi-name"?
>
> In my opinion, "jndi-name" should be deprecated, and we should go for
> "local-jndi-name" and "remote-jndi-name" only.
>
> This makes the jndi stuff less confusing in my opinion.
>
> Aslak.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, September 27, 2001 0:14 am
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
>
> > How about this:
> >
> > local-jndi-name
> > remote-jndi-name
> > jndi-name
> >
> > the logic being that if local or remote are specified they apply,
> > but if
> > they are absent _and_ view-type is _not_ both local and remote,
> > then we
> > just use the jndi-name attribute?
> >
> > cheers
> > dim
> >
> > ps - sorry I've been quiet recently, taken on a bit too much...
> > should be
> > back on deck soon (o:
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> >
> > > Agree.
> > >
> > > Ara.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:23 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
> > > >
> > > > The @ejb:bean tag has a parameter named "jndi-name". It seems
> > to that
> > > > that both (remote) home and local home interfaces are bound to the
> > > same
> > > > name. Shouldn't there be a different jndi name for each? At
> > least WLS
> > > > wants different jndi names for each of the two homes.
> > > >
> > > > I propose adding a new parameter "local-jndi-name" parameter to
> > > > @ejb:bean. home-local.j would have to be changed.
> > > >
> > > > Any comments?
> > > >
> > > > Aslak
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
