Whatever it was it will be ok again when I commit the new ifIsAConcreteEJBean code :o)
Ara. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dmitri Colebatch > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:42 AM > To: David Budworth > Cc: XDoclet Dev List > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Base classes of EJBs getting parsed when not > in fileset? > > What were you upgrading from? a previous cvs version? we've done a lot > of refactoring recently, but I'd be surprised if there was anything that > upset that... Ara - nothing changed in the file selection did it? > > cheers > dim > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, David Budworth wrote: > > > Howdy yall, > > > > I'm not sure this should go to the dev list, but since it's CVS version > I'm > > using, I figured I should say it here. > > > > After I did a CVS update today, I found that my base classes form my > beans > > was getting parsed even though they are not in the list of files. > > > > My xdoclet tag in my build.xml file explicitly has > > <fileset dir="${java.src}"> <include name="**/*Bean.java"></fileset> > > > > And my classes are: > > public class CustomerBean extends EntityBase > > > > (Where EntityBase implements the EntityBean, and defines some common > stuff > > (like log objects, etc)). > > > > Yesterday, this worked fine, beans were generated with no problem, but > as of > > today (I did a CVS update an hour ago), I get build errors saying that > > EntityBase doesn't have a @ejb:bean tag. > > > > So, I'm guessing that something is ignoreing the fileset, or figuring > out > > that CustomerBean extends EntityBase and attempts to parse it. > > > > I figured I could just add: > > @ejb:bean generate="false" name="EntityBase" //XDoclet chokes if there's > no > > name attribute, although it shouldn't since I told it not to generate > > > > to the base class. But then another problem occurs, CustomerBeanData > > attempts to extent EntityBaseData (which doesn't exist, since > > generate="false") > > > > So, my question is, does anyone know what changed? Or where I should > start > > looking to fix this? I just started using XDoclet this week, so I'm not > > super familure with the code structure. > > > > I'd be happy to fix it and submit the patch, I just need a little hint > on > > where to look. > > > > Thanks, > > -David Budworth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
