> Browsing through the tagmappings.properties file, I noticed that all the > tag handlers are within a tags sub-package, except for two: > Info=xdoclet.doc.info.InfoTagsHandler and > Jmx=xdoclet.jmx.JmxTagsHandler, > which made me wonder > > a) assuming the info stuff needs to be kept separate from the main > documentation subtasks (kind of like the ejb.vendor bits), shouldn't its > tag handler be in xdoclet.doc.tags.info, similar to how we have > xdoclet.ejb.tags.vendor?
xdoclet.doc.info.tags.InfoTagsHandler IMHO in fact we should have arranged jboss class/taghandler in xdoclet.ejb.vendor.jboss and xdoclet.ejb.vendor.jboss.tags. > b) should the Jmx classes be in a vendor package like all the other 3rd > party tasks & tag handlers? e.g. xdoclet.vendor.jmx and > xdoclet.tags.vendor.jmx JMX is a JCP standard so not a vendor. > c) I don't see xdoclet.doc.tags.DocumentationTagsHandler in the > tagmappings.properties at all. Should it be? Well, I thought it shouldn't show up in global documentation of tags, because it's kinda internal to xdoclet's documenting system and tightly linked with its subtask. Ara. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
