> A wise old hermit known only as Vincent Harcq
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
>
> > BTW in method="..." and parameters="..." there is
> type="..." that is
> > missing to be complete. I had some Boolean getSth() and boolean
> > isSth() in one of my stuff ;-) I think I should add this one also...
>
> You sure about that? I just created a Test.java with
> public class Test {
> boolean foobar() {return false;}
> Boolean foobar() {return new Boolean(false);}
> }
> and it won't compile ("test.java:3: foobar() is already
> defined in test").
I had in fact
public class Test {
boolean isFoobar() {return false;}
Boolean getFoobar() {return new Boolean(false);}
}
Anyway I avoid that now by using
boolean isFoobar() {return false;}
Boolean isFoobarBoolean() {return new Boolean(false);}
> Also, when I was working on some abstract EJB superclasses
> recently I had
> to have the subclasses' finders return the abstract EJB's
> generated PK
> because the compiler insisted the overridden methods have the
> same return
> type...
For this one look at sample CustomerBMPBean, you must have a @ejb:pk
class="test.interfaces.CustomerPK" generate="false" in CustomerBMPBean.
>
>
> Andrew.
>
Vincent
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
