Em Qui, 2002-02-28 às 05:24, Ara Abrahamian escreveu: > And I'm gonna tell you that it's way harder than you think, for example > some vendors (TopLink and websphere for example) support mapping a > single field to a combination of many database column, so you specify a > db-field mapper there and it takes care of merging/splitting it. So > other than the simple one-field->one-db-column mapping you have more > sophisticated one-field->many-db-columns mapping! How are you going to > cover both now in your generic tag? And stuff like that. Tricky....
Yes, this is tricky. But this is what I called in my message "very vendor specific". TopLink and WebSphere both support the simple one-field->one-db-column mapping, right? So they could both benefit from a generic @ejb:column-name tag. If the programmer needs the advanced vendor features, then that's nothing left but to use the vendor-specific tags. You said you was the first guy to propose this kind of modification. Do you still hold your position to it or has you been convinced that's better to have different vendor tags? Note: I'm subscribed to the xdoclet-devel list. So you don't need to reply to me and the list. -- Ja ne, Pazu mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anime Gaiden: de fãs para fãs, sempre.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
