Hi,
This is out of date for me...
It is the only one, the others are really solved :)
Vincent

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew
Stevens
Sent: vendredi 8 mars 2002 23:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] [ xdoclet-Feature Requests-501598 ] Ignore
whitespace before b


A wise old hermit known only as  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:

> Feature Requests item #501598, was opened at 2002-01-10 03:42 You can 
> respond by visiting: 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402707&aid=501598&gro
> up
> _id=31602
> 
> Category: None
> Group: None
> >Status: Closed
> Priority: 5
> Submitted By: Fred Loney (loney)
> Assigned to: Vincent Harcq (vharcq)
> Summary: Ignore whitespace before block tag

Is this one implemented, Vincent, or did you just close it because there

was no response? (it affects whether I need to mention it in
changes.txt) Likewise for those other FRs you closed.


Andrew.

> Initial Comment:
> If a block tag is preceded by a linebreak and
> whitespace, then that linebreak and whitespace should 
> not be printed. E.g. for template fragment:
> 
> <XDoclet:forAllPersistentFields>
>       <XDoclet:ifIsAggregate>
>               // This is an aggregate
>       </XDoclet:ifIsAggregate>
> </XDoclet:forAllPersistentFields>
> 
> xdoclet should not print an extraneous blank line for
> a persistent field if that field is not an aggregate.
> 
> This convention is simple to understand and
> appreciate, and leads to more legible templates and 
> output. This is esp. true for XML output, where blank 
> lines can't be intelligently factored out by a 
> reformatting utility.
> 
> I have coded and tested a change to the 1.0.1
> TemplateEngine.java that makes this work, but the 
> extensive CVS changes to TemplateEngine don't 
> accomodate the change. If this change is desirable, 
> then I can make a compatible change and submit it to 
> the assigned CVS updater. 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Comment By: Vincent Harcq (vharcq)
> Date: 2002-01-25 19:30
> 
> Message:
> Logged In: YES
> user_id=125677
> 
> This kind of added blanks appears in different places.
> Does your patch works in all cases ?
> The rule was also to let Pretty do this kind of job.  For
> example 
> if (...) {
> }
> instead of
> if (...)
> {
> }
> 
> IMHO these things will never be possible through the kind
> of patch you have.
> Anyway attach it here I will commit it.

_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to