> I would not use META-INF as directory name, because it could be confusing > (these are templates for files that eventually come in META-INF, but are > not > needed at deployment). > The Ant In Anger article (http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/ant_in_anger.html) > defines a metadata directory to put all your metadata. > > So I propose > /xdoclet/modules/jboss/src/metadata/jboss-web-xtags.xml > /xdoclet/modules/jboss/src/metadata/jboss-ejb-xtags.xml > /xdoclet/modules/jboss/src/metadata/jboss-jmx-xtags.xml
Disagree. >From ant_in_anger: "These can go under source too, with a metadata directory for web.xml and similar manifests, and a web folder for web content -JSP, html, images and so on. Keeping the content in this folder (or sub heirarchy) together makes it easier to test links before deployment. The actual production of a deployment image -such as a war file- can be left to the appropriate ant task: there is no need to completely model your source tree upon the deployment heirarchy." So it's talking about src/metadata, src/web, etc. Not the actual deployment structure. Let's keep it in meta-inf as everyone. Ara. _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
