Yes!
This idea should also become a good practice for other complex tasks that
use new Erik's feature.
Maybe a bit more ant compliant:
<module>
<fileset dir="flat" includes="*.*" excludes=>
or
<fileset>
<include name ="xdoclet-*.jar" />
<exclude name =... />
</fileset>
</module>
So we could also load from directories with classes in them.
Is this possible?
Vincent
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aslak Helles�y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hani Suleiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: [Xdoclet-user] Xdoclet cvs issues
> First, Bootstrapper is gone (on the MODULE_REFACTROING_BRANCH).
> I like your idea. What if we pass in an array of File objects to
> ModuleFinder.findModules(File[] moduleDirs)?
> This would default to the location of ant.jar, but can be overridden in
> build.xml with a dirset (new Ant feature I think).
>
> You would get something like this:
>
> <ejbdoclet ...>
> <!-- optional if module jars are in a different place than ant.jar -->
> <moduledirs>
> <include name="${standard.modules.dir}"/>
> <include name="${myown.modules.dir}"/>
> </moduledirs>
>
> ...
>
> <ejbdoclet>
>
> What do you others think?
>
> /Aslak
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hani Suleiman
> > Sent: 29. april 2002 14:22
> > To: Aslak Hellesoy
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Xdoclet cvs issues
> >
> >
> > I'll try and find the time to sort out the ant issue, by talking to
> > them/submitting a patch or whatever. However, I still think the way that
> > xdoclet has been changed is not an ideal design.
> >
> > Why not, for example, allow for a plugin directory set to be
> > supplied to the
> > bootstrap task? Right now it just assumes that plugins will be
> > all jar files
> > alongside xdoclet.jar, which while covering the most common
> > usage, does not
> > cover the case where your module jars might be in different
> > places (eg, say
> > you're testing a new jar, that is in another build tree, and you
> > want to link
> > that in), just allowing for a 'module-dir' attribute would
> > achieve the same
> > effect I think, as well as bypassing the ant classloader bug.
> >
> > Quoting Aslak Hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
