Reply about <tag>.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:50 AM Subject: Re: Fw: [Xdoclet-devel] @tags and javadoc 1.4 warnings
> Erik Hatcher wrote: > > From: "Andrew Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>By the way, Erik (resident Ant expert), any idea why the description > >>attribute of tag nested elements is required? (according to the docs at > >>http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/manual/CoreTasks/javadoc.html#tagelement ) > >>The javadoc docs include examples "-tag param", "-tag example:X", etc. > >>which suggests to me it should be optional? > >> > >> > > I believe this is a bug (or limitation). You should be able to specify > tag ordering for standard tags without giving either a scope or a > description. > > Conor > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
